| More
                     than four dozen name disputes are chronicled in
                     Chapters
                     8 and 9
                     of The Domain Name Handbook. Other domain
                     name battles are indexed below, in alphabetical
                     order. Click on a domain name to go to a short
                     summary of the dispute, with links the parties
                     involved, news reports, and legal documents
                     (when available). Other
                     DNS litiigation filed against registries and
                     registrars is linked under
                     Court;
                     filed against allegedfad faith registrants under
                     UDRP
                     Proceedings,
                     both on this website. The full text of the new
                     U.S.
                     Trademark Anticyberpiracy
                     Act
                     and ICANN's
                     Uniform Dispute Resolution
                     Policy
                     are also posted on this site. 
                        It is clear that
                        nothing in trademark law requires that title
                        to domain names that incorporate trademarks
                        or portions of trademarks be provided to
                        trademark holders. To hold otherwise would
                        create an immediate and indefinite monopoly
                        to all famous mark holders on the Internet,
                        by which they could lay claim to all .com
                        domain names which are arguably 'the same' as
                        their mark. The Court may not create such
                        property rights-in-gross as a matter of
                        dilution law. ... Trademark law does not
                        support such a monopoly.
                        
                        
                           --
                           Strick Corporation v. James B. Strickland,
                           EDPA (27-Aug-01) |